I'm sorry you fail at reasoning.

what?

Hand me that red marker Doc, I may be able to help you here...

knock yourself out... please.

reason this:

this was moral

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-i6auAo ... re=related

at the same time this artistic expression was not

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9F4M3xb ... re=related

a little more moral dilemma

http://www.usmbooks.com/ss_christmas_book.html

All of them are better than someone putting a dog turd in a styrofoam cup and calling it art or Mapplethorp getting a $40k NEA award to take a picture of a crucifix in a toilet full of urine.

... and you still have failed to even offer a suggested substrate reagent to build a metalocelluloid, but you claim to be this great chemist. That's why I say you fail at reason.

You fail at deciding who fails, Doc. You should spend more time thinking and less time talking.

I never claimed to be a great chemist! I claimed to know enough fundamental chemistry to tell when somebody else who claimed to be a great chemist was trying to blow smoke up my...... If I recall you claimed gasoline is alcohol, 'nuff said!

So you got one right. Yay. You're ready to challenge the greats.

Now you place the mantle of censor and moralist on to save our souls! I would personally prefer a dog turd in a cup or I would have no problem pissing on a crucifix if it would end mans experiments with genocide. It is pretty obvious you and I have different values!

i thought all the videos were good...in different ways and for different reasons.

of course the ukraine one shows some really awful things that unfortunately happened!

this what i think of censors and such

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zjgEobEM ... re=related

Of course we have different values. I base mine around truth and ethics. ou base yours around puff and fluff and redundancy. I'm sure the potential genocide of an entire planet's civilization by second hand smoke and the depletion of resources that never should have been disrupted to begin with, is okay in your book?