Forums » ArloNet Main Forums » Arlo's Restaurant

 


Post new topic Reply to topic
Author Message
Offline
 Post subject: Gene Weingarten VS Arlo
PostPosted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 11:15 pm
  

Arlo Fanatic

Joined: Aug 25, 1999
Posts: 1274
Location: Herndon, Virginia
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... tml?sub=AR

I was gonna post this in Folksinger Spottings, but the forum is locked.

Gene Weingarten, Pulitzer Prizewinner columnist for the Washington Post interviewed Arlo for his July 4th column. Funny and interesting, and it asks a question I also wondered about...Just how DID that envelope addressed to Arlo end up under a half-ton of Alice and Ray's garbage??


          Top  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 11:36 pm
  

User avatar
Arlo Fanatic

Joined: Jan 09, 2003
Posts: 2493
Images: 5
Location: Rhododendron, Oregon United States
Hehehe. I love it!


          Top  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 12:47 am
  

User avatar
Arlo Fanatic

Joined: Jul 06, 2008
Posts: 2531
Images: 2
Location: Crawfordville, Florida
Great little interview........Thanks Gus!!! 8)


          Top  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 7:04 am
  

BlunderVirgin

Joined: Jul 05, 2010
Posts: 2
That's not what I wondered when I read the article. What I wondered was WHEN THE HELL DID ARLO BECOME A REPUBLICAN??? Someone please tell me this was a joke, Arlo pulling the Pulitzer Prize Winning Journalist's Leg. I feel like Gene, but worse. :cry:


          Top  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 7:09 am
  

BlunderVirgin

Joined: Jul 05, 2010
Posts: 2
btw, I'm not a "Blunder Virgin." I'm an Arlo Fanatic, and I joined long, long ago, like in the 90's. But then life intervened, and I haven't been on in years. I've kept going to his shows, but didn't have the time for the online life. This article has sent me reeling back to this community, though, to plead: say it ain't so.


          Top  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 1:13 pm
  

User avatar
Arlo Fanatic

Joined: Jul 06, 2008
Posts: 2531
Images: 2
Location: Crawfordville, Florida
I've been trying to find for you the link to an interview a while back where Arlo discussed his reasons for the switch, but can't put my finger on it right now. He essentially said that the GOP needed some different voices from within it's own ranks.......Arlo didn't want to be just another echo of voices in the Democratic machine (You can jump in here anytime and straighten me out Arlo). If you look back through the forums you will find some discussions about this. And welcome back! :D


          Top  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 2:59 pm
  

User avatar
Arlo Fanatic

Joined: Sep 12, 2000
Posts: 6517
Location: New Jersey
I'm not worried. Arlo has commented during the Bush years that "Even Richard Nixon is starting to look pretty good these days".
I think Arlo may be more of a Lincoln Republican. :)
In any event, regardless of if one is listening to a politician or a folksinger, listening to what they say and watching what they do will give you far more insight into who they are and what they stand for than what label has been afixed to them; regardless if it was afixed by themselves or others.


          Top  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 9:39 pm
  

ArloNetizen

Joined: Jun 12, 2009
Posts: 38
I haven't been home very much - yet. But that will change now that we're getting into the heart of summertime. I've been getting quite a few responses to the posts here at arlo.net concerning various subjects. I've been thinking it would be a good idea to further the conversation. There's controversy surrounding just about everything going on these days. And although I think discussing difficult subjects is good for the soul, I constantly have to remind myself that it ain't all there is.

For example, about 5 or 6 years ago I left the Democratic Party and joined the Republican Party. I did so because I believed that my voice (and others like mine) needed to be heard where it would be most useful. Frankly, I still don't believe there's a whole lot of difference between the two. But, a healthy democracy needs a loyal and healthy opposition. Without it we run the risk of a march toward totalitarianism that would be difficult to halt.

At the time the Republicans were in power everywhere and they were seemingly taken over by ideas that ran counter to traditional Republican positions. They used to be for less big government intrusion into our lives. To me that's usually always a good idea.

So what was up with interfering in matters of who can marry who? That's a big invasion into personal freedoms and liberties. Those who try to control our personal lives are not only not for traditional Republican values, they're not even really for American values. The way I view it, the state has no business in the house let alone the bedroom. The way I would resolve the current controversy would be to insure that secular marriage be open to anyone. And that religious marriage not be infringed upon by the state - to marry or not as their traditions permit. Both religious and secular marriages would be acknowledged as it is now. That, to me, should be the Republican position.

What's up with the bail outs etc? I hate to say it but the arguments in Congress and on TV miss the more important points. Talking heads and political animals arguing about how much to spend and where are not talking about the basic truth - that when more dollars get printed, the less each dollar is worth. With trillions of dollars being manufactured to pay for bail outs and other tasks, each dollar buys less stuff. Not only have we given gazillionaires our tax dollars, we've made each dollar we still posses just about worthless. Saving and creating jobs may be an appropriate government intrusion in extraordinary times, but to do so in a way that makes our money worthless benefits no one in the long and endangers the nation. A return to real money - where the value is not up for discussion is the only protection a wage earner really has. That, to me, should be the Republican position.

What's up with rebuilding infrastructure? The best way to insure we'll have a 20th century transportation system in the 21st century is to rebuild the existing infrastructure. I thought by now we'd be flying around in personal (automobile-size) vehicles. There's no reason we can't be building vehicles that use magnetic fields for flight and navigation... okay maybe I'm getting ahead of things. The point is that it seems easier to get to the freaking moon than it does to get from coast to coast. Who's thinking about that stuff? Constantly widening roads and bridges that devour the land with all the intersecting attributes of the same chains of crappola shops and fast (nutritionally worthless genetically modified and just plain bad) food restaurants can't be the next best hope for our nation's infrastructure. That, to me, should be a Republican concern.

What's up with health care? In a world where even the good guys (National Public Radio, Farm Aid etc.) are sponsored and funded by organizations more powerful than any nation, it's hard to imagine that the bottom line will not be what's profitable, instead of what is beneficial. Can the two co-exist? Sure. Do they? No. The sad truth looks to be that it's more profitable to have a nation filled with people who are in bad health, than a nation of healthy people. The current administration and the Congress has been talking about how to make health care accessible to everyone, because they all know that these multinational organizations will be more than happy to provide long term drugs and services to a nation that permits and even encourages bad health whether or not a new health care plan comes into being. It's a win - win for government, insurance companies, pharmaceutical companies, hospitals, doctors, lawyers and agriculture. Only you lose.

The march has already begun around the world to outlaw the use of natural medicines - vitamins, minerals, herbs, and other plants so that you will become a criminal and a law breaker when you try to care for your own family in your own way. You are no longer responsible for yourself or your family, as the state has in no uncertain terms made it clear that you belong to the nation, and the nation has every right to protect you and your family from yourselves. The child in the midwest with cancer forced to undergo chemo and radiation being only the latest example. Is this not a cause for some loyal opposition? Where the hell are these guys when you need them? It's not a matter of being right or wrong. I've been both many times. It's a matter of having a real contest of ideas between different opinions. Sadly the Republican voice has drifted off to Neverland while the larger issues of what health care actually is gets run over by arguments of how and who will pay for it.

I want government and big business out of my garden. I want insurance companies out of my way when I go visit my doc. I want to pilot my cool 21st century flying electro-magnetic car. I want real money. And I want to get out of the business of being in politics in either party. But, someone has to say something. And these are just a few of the things I think need to be said. There's more... Wars, interventions, useless government agencies, education policies, privacy issues, an end to criminalization of personal choice things... all kinds of stuff.

Granted I've had two cups of coffee this morning, so I've gone on longer than I should have. And like i noted above, I don't expect to be right on anything. I'm perfectly capable of listening to a good argument and changing my mind. I'm not a piece of stone. Please feel free to take issue with me on anything - I enjoy changing my mind. I just wouldn't expect anything beyond a good friendly listen. There's more to this world than getting involved but there's times you just feel like you have to do something, say something or be somebody - however uncalled for. There is, in my view a larger bigger picture where we are all stuck on some little tiny world in a very big universe of unimaginable largeness. Like ants figuring out which way back to the ant hill, our journeys however big they may seem to us, are small in the big picture of things.

That's no excuse not to get back to the hill... An ant's gotta do what an ant's gotta do. Keeping the big picture in mind, knowing there's more to life than arguing about everything, but maintaining the basic nature of a free and democratic nation, taking care of each other in ways that encourage security, prosperity and tranquility - Freedom, Liberty, Justice - You know, all the good stuff, these are worth talking about. I'll go on talking and thinking about these things wherever I think they need to be heard, even though I know full well, they won't be inviting me to any clambakes or anything. Good thing I got my own clams... adg


Did nea know how to post the link, so I did a cut and paste of the posting for you.

SASSY :D


          Top  
Reply with quote  
Offline
PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:54 am
  

User avatar
Arlo Fanatic

Joined: Feb 26, 2009
Posts: 1201
If ya consider just how far right the fringes are going these days, someone joining the Republican party IS joining the left or at least what's left.

I wondered what was going on until I read Arlo's response Sassy is quoting last year. The dividing lines are getting blurrier than ever. Maybe Arlo is just that one lone dude standing next to the cross roads pointing and saying, "They went that away."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d03hX-lBhSI


          Top  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 12:37 pm
  

Senior ArloNetizen

Joined: Jul 30, 2008
Posts: 374
Location: Washington, DC
Huh. I'd always assumed that the letter placed under the garbage was the draft notice. (That's my brain...trying to tie things together a little too neatly.)

And I thought I saw a recent interview with Arlo in which he said he'd converted from Republican to independent...maybe that was just wishful thinking.


          Top  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 2:19 pm
  

ArloNetizen

Joined: May 24, 2000
Posts: 34
Location: aston,pa,usa
I always figured the letter was just in the back of the micro van ;-)
As to the Republican thing I have been registered that was for a long time. I thought, I agree with most of what any of the Dems were saying so why not talk to the other side from the inside. If I couldn't change their minds at least I could cast my vote to the best Democrat, left leaning Republican on the ticket.


          Top  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jul 08, 2010 12:02 am
  

User avatar
Arlo Fanatic

Joined: Sep 13, 2000
Posts: 8521
Location: Pixley-- Actually An Hr South of Richmond, VA
He moved on over to the right side lol...


          Top  
Reply with quote  
Offline
PostPosted: Fri Jul 09, 2010 3:16 pm
  

User avatar
The Folkslinger

Joined: Nov 23, 1999
Posts: 1225
Images: 42
Location: Housatonic, MA
Geez I even sound lucid :)


          Top  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 09, 2010 8:29 pm
  

Senior ArloNetizen

Joined: Nov 12, 2005
Posts: 130
Location: Ridgecrest, California (South of Lone Pine, North of LA)
must be the latte!


          Top  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 09, 2010 10:54 pm
  

User avatar
Arlo Fanatic

Joined: Jan 09, 2003
Posts: 2493
Images: 5
Location: Rhododendron, Oregon United States
adg wrote:
Geez I even sound lucid :)


That's debatable...


          Top  
Reply with quote  
 
Post new topic Reply to topic



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group