Some things work different in our world(The Blunderworld). And some things that remain as mysterious to the outside world may be explained by the laws of blunder. To this end, we dedicate this thread. For example:

Einstein proved that ,in theory ,as part of his famous equation of E=mc2, that forward time travel was possable.This has been proven in modern times with the use of aircraft and atomic clocks. If one does the math, as one example, if you were to travel at 99.9999999999999...% of the speed of light for 6 years, you would arrive approx. 450,000 years into the future. This is accepted now as fact.
However, BACKWARDS time travel is another story. This is where blunderites come in.....maybe. If remarkable speed creates forward motion in time, then it stands to reason that standing perfectly still, and doing absolutly nothing, may at least freeze time, AND, if any blunderite were to perfect the art of doing absolutly nothing to the point where they may actually be doing less than absolutly nothing, that blunderite may actually be moving at a speed less than zero, and may in fact travel BACK in time.
This theory also provides for the blunderite mindset, and says that any blunderite moving back in time might not go back any farther than mid-August 1969. This troubles people that study dinosaurs and stuff, but screw them. If any of this makes any sense to you at all, welcome aboard, and please seek professional help ASAP. Thank you.
----------------------------------------

Please feel free to add to this forum in the spirit suggested.

<center><FONT COLOR="#000080">--- Edited 1 times, lastly by Larry on Apr 06, 2002 ---</FONT></center>

Larry, as usual, you've hit the nail on the head. Of course, it's impossible to go back in time before August, 1969, because that was our origin (known as the Big Blunder) when everything was contained in and at a central point or singularity.

As far as doing less than nothing, and therefore freezing time, now that I am not working I am involved in seeking the answer to the riddle you pose. All indications are that the less one does, the FASTER time moves, so I expect to arrive in the far future real soon.

i trust you realize all this will only be recognized once reduced to an extremely
complicated mathmatical equation in order to simplify it?

i'll start the algebraic manipulations stat..
if correct, i should be done sometime last
month..or two.

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by todd:

i'll start the algebraic manipulations stat..
if correct, i should be done sometime last
month..or two.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Here is the paradox. If you do these calculations, you will be doing something, so you must first go forward to go back. If it works, you will see yourself starting this project sometime after you finish it.
Otherwise, check with Mikey, I think he might be onto something with his "Big Blunder" theory. I mean it sounds better than "The Big Bang"....which always kinda sounded like a Roman orgy to me anyway.

It's interesting. I don't do math or physics, though, so could you let me know when we get there? Are we there yet?

we're not there now because we were there before, but we headed back there...is that it?

You can't get THERE from HERE. You can only get THERE from THERE, but then of course the THERE you're at would be HERE. Like Larry says, we need to do the math on this stuff.

...i don't know, i'm just guessing...but i'm thinking you all's expertise just might be useful over on the starship blunderer, cuz lawd knows...

It's not so much about here and there as it is about now and then, and thens that will be. And it's not to be confused with celery time unless you want it to be.

Ah, but Larry, NOW and THEN are simply points in time just as HERE and THERE are points in space. It's all connected, don't you know. Now go up to the blackboard and show the class the math. NOW, KID! (or maybe we'll wait until THEN).

2+2=5.....that's about it.

mickey postulates that time goes faster, the less one does mmm, yea, has a nice entropic ring to it, but, no rythym....needs a beat..but,,, if you move, not necessarily to, or away, just ..move... you encounter new experiences, and encounters, outcounters, even.. so what is, becomes what was not, before, and.. you.... um... go, from there...

"...was this high and winding stair...I'd be there" Arlo

I'd just like to remind all the wonderful minds here that this thread is dedicated to all of blunder science and blunder theory, not only the areas of time travel, and time and space in general. We welcome any and all theorys and scientific fact and speculation from all the varied disiplines of scientific study, as they relate to blunder of course.
There are so many fields to chose from,biology...ecology...physics...music theory...philosophy...earth science....etc.
There are also many theorys and unsolved problems of science that need further investigation, such as : "The theory of cerebral flatulence", "The chicken or the egg?", "Tastes great!/ less filling!", " Ginger or Maryanne?"," That light in the fridge thing"........you get the picture! SO, can we share the single collective blunderite brain cell and get cracking?!?!?! The world awaits our conclusions!!!!!

But of course we can still talk about the time thing too!
Further study reveals that it may be true that a blunderite MAY have already traveled back in time!!! This is exciting news!!
And when Cheryl gets back, we expect a full report! <img src="http://www.arlo.net/ubb/smilies/smile.gif" width=15 height=15>

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Larry:
SO, can we share the single collective blunderite brain cell and get cracking?!?!?! The world awaits our conclusions!!!!!<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Don't you mean "The world awaits our confusions!!"????

When is it my turn for the brain cell?
... or do we each get full time with 1/1116 of the cell? (or is it 1/1117... 1/1118...?)

Peace, Love, Music $ (((HUGS)))
~Wyldflower
<img src="http://www.arlo.net/ubb/smilies/tiedye.gif" width=17 height=17>