Forums » Group W Forums » Topical Tropical Discussions

 


Post new topic Reply to topic
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 04, 2004 4:38 am
  

User avatar
Arlo Fanatic

Joined: Jun 09, 2004
Posts: 1931
Location: Brisbane OZ
It's 5:30 P.M. on Mon 4th and I'm listening to Lehrer (from your Fri night) they're disscussing the Debate, Sheilds and Brooks are on now. Everyones been raving on the radio news about how well he did!! Do you guys agree cos I didn't get to see it.


          Top  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 04, 2004 9:31 am
  

User avatar
Arlo Fanatic

Joined: Aug 25, 1999
Posts: 1089
Location: Ocala, FL, USA
Louise, not only did Kerry mop the floor with him, but the debate seems to have caused an upsurge in voter registrations nationwide. This upsurge has to be a big negative for Bush and his cronies. Let's face it, the American voter at the margin (especially those who haven't voted in the past due to age or race) aren't likely to be Republicans.


          Top  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 05, 2004 5:14 am
  

User avatar
Arlo Fanatic

Joined: Jun 09, 2004
Posts: 1931
Location: Brisbane OZ
Thanks Mikey!
Yeah I'm still waiting for my absentee ballot.Boy it's good to know more people are registering thanks to the Debate and Mike's Slackers tour. Hope Kerry does as well on Friday night (What an I saying he will !!)
Just finished watching Lehrer, and saw Kerry and Shrub back on the trail covering domestic issues. Kerry looked very confident. Shrub looked like he usually does (you know what I mean...) And the way Shrub has twisted Kerry's words from the debate( on pre- emptive strikes) in his new T.V. ads!!! How can people fall for that!!!
Gosh I wish I could be there when Kerry wins. You'll hear me screaming with JOY from across the ocean waves!!


          Top  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 8:13 am
  

I thought that the VP debate was close to being a tie, with a slight edge to Edwards coz his summation at the end was much better than Cheney's & coz Edwards looked charismatic on TV while Cheney looked uncomfortable. To go back to '60's TV comparisons, they looked like Col. Hogan & Col. Klink.

Remember, however, that of the 4 president/VP candidates, Cheney has by far the lowest approval rating of all. Both attacked effectively, but it's likely that most viewers simply didn't believe any of Cheney's attacks. Thus, I believe that to be successful last night, all Edwards had to do was tie, & he certainly did at least that.


          Top  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 8:50 am
  

Arlo Fanatic

Joined: Sep 15, 2001
Posts: 3682
Location: Dallas, Texas
At times Cheney reminded me of Mr. Potter in "It's a Wonderful Life." Now that's an apt image.


          Top  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 9:34 am
  

User avatar
Arlo Fanatic

Joined: May 25, 2001
Posts: 3074
Location: Colorado Rocky Mountain High
Didn't Cheney sometimes look like a turtle, pulling his head back into his shell?

When he was on the defensive, he seemed to shrink back, head down, hands up near his face... What could he be trying to hide? LOL

I thought it ended up with Edwards winning, but not by a large margin.

One commentator I was listening to said that for many of those sitting on the fence, the VP candidates are critical in their decision who to vote for. Now really, people, if anything were to happen to the president, one of these two would move into the White House... which one would you rather see there?


          Top  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 1:06 pm
  

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>
. . .if you go, for example, to factcheck.com, an independent Web site sponsored by the University of Pennsylvania, you can get the specific details with respect to Halliburton.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Remember Chency saying this last night?

He misspoke. He meant to say factcheck.org. George Soros spotted this error right away & bought the URL factcheck.com.

Check out what it says on

http://www.factcheck.com !


          Top  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 2:24 pm
  

Arlo Fanatic

Joined: Sep 15, 2001
Posts: 3682
Location: Dallas, Texas
<img src="http://www.arlo.net/ubb/smilies/laugh.gif" width=15 height=15>


          Top  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 5:04 pm
  

User avatar
Arlo Fanatic

Joined: Aug 25, 1999
Posts: 1089
Location: Ocala, FL, USA
Bush got tough with Kerry in a campaign speech today. Unfortunately, nobody reminded him that it was too little and too late. He reminds me of a fighter who, after getting an ass-whipping, can't wait for a rematch so he can get beat again.

The format of Friday's debate is a "Town Hall" with pre-selected questions from the audience. I figure Bush will pull out "My Pet Goat" from his pocket and go into one of his patented seven-minute trances instead of answering any tough questions.

Jeez, I'll be glad when the American people speak on 11/2; at least this crap will be over.


          Top  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 07, 2004 2:15 am
  

User avatar
Arlo Fanatic

Joined: Jun 09, 2004
Posts: 1931
Location: Brisbane OZ
Thanks guys for your thoughts.I'll be watching Lehrer next week to get some feedback on the Fri night debate, but please keep me posted on the real, fairdinkum facts please!!!! We've got our big election here on Sat.We've had 6 weeks of campaining here and thats longer than usual here. People here are getting sick of it but good news is there seems to be alot of swing away from Little Johnnie.


          Top  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 09, 2004 9:46 am
  

I guess Bush supporters are gonna think that Bush won last night's debate, while Kerry supporters will think that he won the debate. It was close, & Bush was certainly better than he was the last time.

As I watched it, I thought it was about a tie, altho' Bush's answers had a strange quality about them, as tho' they were memorized by rote; he took odd pauses where he seemed to be groping for a word. As I thought about the debate later, I thought Kerry had more substance & a couple of Bush's answers were stupid. When Kerry explained that altho' he personally didn't believe in abortion as a Catholic, he felt that he couldn't legislate his religious beliefs on those who didn't share them, Bush responded by saying that he couldn't follow what Kerry had just said.

I was glad to see Kerry mention Halliburton a few times. Neither mentioned how he was gonna halve the deficit, but both spoke at length on how they would solve various domestic problems. It probably made many viewers wonder why Bush suddenly wanted to solve problems that he & his Congress didn't solve for 4 years.

Anyways...I won't be home to watch the next debate, but even if I was, I might not be watching it anyway, as it's starting to get a bit redundant.

(Edited for grammar, spelling, blah, blah.)

<center><FONT COLOR="#000080">--- Edited 1 times, lastly by P. Pittsburgh Joe on Oct 09, 2004 ---</FONT></center>


          Top  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 10, 2004 1:31 am
  

Possibly Kerry didnt 'Perform' as well as he did in the 1st debate.
However, Jr.'s rebutals, at times when he'd have 1 1/2 mins, did any one notice on certain issues, he'd ask "Am I out of Time"?, "No Sir, you still have time left", So Jr. just strated Ramblin, not even attempting to actually 'Rebute' Sen. Kerry's comments. To me, it semed as though Jr. was answering w/ lotsa Uhum, aahh's hem-haawwin'-MMMM, well, "Its Hard Work'...I still feel,strongly, Jr.'s gotta go in '04
& This man actually holds a Degree of Higher Education, I do wonder how that event happened!{well w/exception, as to his Daddy}!
Well, louise,yes, about 32 cents... its MY COMPUTER, ITS JUST TYPES IN'32 CENTS! ,<img src="http://www.arlo.net/ubb/smilies/wink.gif" width=15 height=15>


          Top  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:44 am
  

User avatar
Arlo Fanatic

Joined: Jun 09, 2004
Posts: 1931
Location: Brisbane OZ
Thanks for the feedback,ruthie and Joe
Hey have you been to Mike Moore's site lately? What a Hoot!! He's sure doing a great job!!


          Top  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 14, 2004 4:43 am
  

User avatar
Arlo Fanatic

Joined: Jun 09, 2004
Posts: 1931
Location: Brisbane OZ
I listen to the radio all day at work (our "thinking persons" station)cos I work by myself most of the time and also like to keep informed. So little snippets of the debate was on today (Thursday) at 11 A.M. and I was getting reports on Bush answering questions by sprouting on about "no child left behind" and stuff. On the way home listening in the car they had Bruce Shapiro from The Nation on with a more in depth report and also how heaps of people are registering. They also had a story about how some states like Penn, are being sued in the supreme court for being too slow to send out Absentee Ballots to Americans overseas. I eagerly look in my mailbox (a fairdinkum U.S.Mail one) every day but am still waiting for mine! So gimme the Drum (Oz for the Poop)
The Poop, The whole Poop, and nothing but the Poop.


          Top  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:08 am
  

User avatar
Arlo Fanatic

Joined: Sep 12, 2000
Posts: 6517
Location: New Jersey
Debate score: Kerry 3-Bush 0. But the election is close, and I fear that Ralph Nader may once again shoot himself and us in the foot.


          Top  
Reply with quote  
 
Post new topic Reply to topic



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests


Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group